May 22nd, 2013
May 16th, 2013
December 20th, 2012

Kale Alderson stands at the grave of his father, World War II veteran James Alderson, at Glen Oaks Memorial Park in Chico. James Alderson died in September, but the VA didn’t grant his pension benefits until three months later.

The VA’s inability to pay benefits to veterans before they die is increasingly common, according to data that we’ve obtained. It, for the first time, that long wait times are contributing to tens of thousands of veterans being approved for disability benefits and pensions only after it is too late for the money to help them.

In the fiscal year that ended in September, the agency paid $437 million in retroactive benefits to the survivors of nearly 19,500 veterans who died waiting.

Get the full story: http://ow.ly/ggTlv

November 10th, 2012

Disabled troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan face an unexpected battle: the Department of Veterans Affairs’ still-massive stack of disability benefit claims, leading to processing delays of six months or more.

Nationwide, 820,105 vets are waiting on a response to claims of a disease, injury or illness suffered in the military.

260: Average number of days that a veteran waits for the government to respond to his or her claim as of 8/2012.

Compare backlogs and wait times at the 58 VA regional offices on this interactive map. It automatically updates weekly, tracking in real-time whether the VA is living up to its promises to improve.

August 31st, 2012

Get more on this story - The geographic inequity of VA wait times is fully detailed for the first time in our analysis. Simply put: Veterans in sparsely populated states often encounter quick resolution of their compensation claims for problems ranging from back injuries to post-traumatic stress disorder while those in metropolitan areas languish.

Read our full story and find out how long vets in your area are waiting.

May 4th, 2012

Explainer: How Guantanamo’s ‘war court’ differs from federal system

Tomorrow, five men accused of planning the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people on 9/11 will be arraigned in a military courtroom at the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba. The high-profile case will shine an international spotlight on a “war court” system that, despite legal reforms, is derided as inherently unjust by critics and lauded by proponents as the most secure, efficient forum to try detainees suspected of terrorism. A trial could offer an intimate look at the events leading up to the 2001 terrorist attacks and also could raise the issues of torture and inmate abuse that became synonymous with the infamous prison.

We break down how the Guantanamo ‘war court’ will differ from the federal system. Check out our Explainer for more.

Image: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is shown in this file photograph during his arrest March 1, 2003. The accused 9/11 mastermind and four suspected co-conspirators are facing trial in a Guantanamo war crimes tribunal on charges that could carry the death penalty. Credit: Courtesy of U.S. News & World Report/Reuters

May 1st, 2012

In the combined wars of Afghanistan and Iraq, all 50 states and the territories have lost service members. More than 6,300 people have died and more than 44,000 have been wounded in action, many of whom were saved by modern medicine not available during previous wars. Click through to see our map of casualties by state.

April 30th, 2012
Reblogged from California Watch
April 20th, 2012

According to the new documentary “The Invisible War”, military women are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire. This new film, premiering at the San Francisco Film Festival this week, looks at the epidemic of rape within the U.S. military. We’ll be interviewing the director Kirby Dick about the production of his film for our series Behind the Story. What questions would you ask him?

March 30th, 2012
Reblogged from California Watch
Loading tweets...

@CIRonline

At The Center for Investigative Reporting, we believe journalism that moves citizens to action is an essential pillar of democracy. Since 1977, CIR has relentlessly pursued and uncovered injustices that otherwise would be hidden from the public eye. Today, we are upholding this legacy and looking forward, working at the forefront of journalistic innovation to produce important stories that make a difference and engage our audiences across the aisle, coast to coast, and worldwide. What drives our work isn't profit – it's impact. Learn more at http://cironline.org/

Networks